Nazih Khatatba, the editor of Meshwar magazine, says it is required to strengthen the front of opponents to this IRHA definition of antisemitism.
Tagged By IHRA
Vote Palestine campaign: “Reject the IHRA definition of antisemitism”
Vote Palestine a non-partisan campaign hoping to galvanize voters to raise the issue of Palestinian human rights in Canada’s federal election.
CD4HR: IHRA definition of antisemitism is “fraud and fabricated”
A pro-Palestinian Canadian advocacy group states “Free Palestine till is Israel is fully dismantled”
Government of Quebec adopts IHRA non-binding definition of antisemitism
the Government of Quebec stated: “Criticizing or demonstrating peacefully against Israel’s position in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not in itself anti-Semitism”
Thornhill NDP endorses BDS, rejects IHRA definition of antisemitism
The New Democratic Party in the riding of Thornhill. Ontario endorses two anti-Israel resolution demanding to “allow refugees to return home”
Faisal Bhabha says Israel lobby in Canada has “undemocratic tendencies”
Faisal Bhabha, NCCM’s legal adviser, says “it’s important to continue to insist on exposing and confronting the broader undemocratic tendencies of the Israel lobby”
Government of Ontario adopts and recognizes IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism
“We stand with Ontario’s Jewish community in defence of their rights and fundamental freedoms as we always have and always will,” the Government of Ontario stated
Toronto protest: “From the river to the sea Palestine will be free”
The Palestinian Canadian Community Centre – Palestine House held an anti-Israel demonstration at Dundas Square in Toronto
Faisal Bhabha says “racist” IHRA promotes “negative stereotypes of Jews”
Faisal Bhabha, NCCM’s legal adviser, says calling for the “erasure of Jewish majority state or annihilation of the Jews is not a call for the eradication of people”
Faisal Bhabha opposes aspects of IHRA definition of antisemitism
Faisal Bhabha says that “accusing Israel as a state of exaggerating the Holocaust could be for some a plausible argument”